Tirath singh v. bachittar singh

Author: ltup

August undefined, 2024

WebSep 29, 2024 · Tirath Singh v. Bachittar Singh, AIR 1955 SC 850. In this case, there was an issue with regard to issuing of the notice under section 99 of Representation of People’s … Web“17. It is true there is a principle of interpretation of statutes that the plain or grammatical construction which leads to injustice or absurdity is to be avoided (see Venkatarama Iyer, J. in Tirath Singh v. Bachittar Singh 1955 2 SCR 457 (AIR at p. 855). But that principle can be applied only if ‘the language admits of an interpretation ...

Tirath Singh Vs Bachittar Singh and Others. - Legal Authority

WebAug 23, 2024 · (Tirath Singh v. Bachittar Singh [AIR 1955 SC 830] , AIR p. 833, para 7.)" "Consideration of hardship, injustice or absurdity as avoiding a particular construction is a rule which must be applied with great care. 'The argument ab inconvenienti', said Lord Moulton, 'is one which requires to be used with great caution'. WebBachittar Singh. Fort of Kotla Nihang Khan, village Kotla Nihang Khan, Rupnagar district,Punjab,India. Bhai Bachittar Singh (6 May 1664 – 22 December 1705), often known with the honorific "Shaheed" (martyr), was a Sikh hero and a general of Guru Gobind Singh. [1] His father was Bhai Mani Singh and he came from Alipur Riyasat Multan. low keyboard chroma

Tirath Singh v. Bachittar Singh And Others - Casemine

WebIt is to be noted that in a case which went up before the Supreme Court and which is Tirath Singh v. Bachittar Singh, the certificate under article 133(1)(c) of the Constitution was granted by the High Court in respect of its judgment in relation to a proceeding which came up before the High Court from an Election Tribunal in exercise of its ... WebTirath Singh v/s Bachittar Singh and Others Civil Appeal No. 21 of 1955 Decided On, 15 September 1955. At, Supreme ... before they are named.Reliance was also placed by the … WebOct 17, 2024 · Tirath Singh v. Bachittar Singh RESEARCH PAPERS Shrikant P Thombre, General principles of statutory interpretation with special reference to golden rule & … jason thompson baseball card

N.C. MOOKERJEE AND CO. v. UNION OF INDIA - 1963-LL-0214

Statutes Must Be Interpreted In A Just, Reasonable And Sensible …

Web[476 D-E] Tirath Singh v. Bachittar Singh, [1955] 2 S.C.R. 457, referred to. CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Criminal Appeal No. 97 of 1964. Appeal by special leave from … Webpublic health and not – broadcasting (G. Chawla v. State of Rajasthan, AIR 1959 SC 544). Answer 1(c) According to Section 2(1) (b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, … jason thompson city of gastoniaWebAmrit Kaur Tewari (September 5, 1938 – January 13, 2024) was an Indian dental physician and a former Dean of the Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh. She also served as Head, Oral Health Sciences Centre, PGI. She was the daughter of Sardar Tirath Singh Gurum who was the minister in the Erstwhile PEPSU.. … jason thompson dds cincinnati reviews

"WebJan 30, 2024 · The petitioner has contended that since there was only one transaction in the present case, the trader cannot be treated as a “casual trader”. The petitioner has … " - Tirath singh v. bachittar singh

Tirath singh v. bachittar singh

Tirath Singh vs Bachittar Singh And Others on 15 September, 1955

WebFeb 26, 2024 · 18 Rananjaya Singh v Baijnath Singh AIR 1954 Sc 749. 10 P a g e. ... In India, the Supreme Court in Tirath Singh V. Bachittar Singh 28 approved and adopted the purposive . approach. WebAmrik Singh Vs. The State of Pepsu [1955] INSC 9 (28 February 1955) Judgement Date : 28 Feb 1955 Citation : 1955 Latest Caselaw 9 SC Government of India Act, 1935 Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) IPC Section 409. Criminal breach of trust by public servant, or by banker, merchant or agent IPC Section 465. Punishment for forgery Headnote :

Did you know?

WebMar 30, 2024 · Bachittar Singh (1955). In this case, the Court held that the provisions of impugned Section 99 of Representation of People’s Act, 1951, must be interpreted by … WebJul 27, 2006 · Appeal under Article 133 (1) (c) of the Constitution of India against the Judgment and Order dated the 12th January 1954 of the Pepsu High Court in Civil Misc. …

WebTirath Singh v. Bachittar Singh And Others Venkatarama Ayyar, J.— The appellant was a candidate for election to the Legislative Assembly of the State of PEPSU from the Dhuri … WebSharma Management Inc. Jan 2013 - Present10 years 4 months. Milpitas, California.

WebFeb 15, 2024 · Tirath Singh v. Bachittar Singh, AIR 1955 SC 850 The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be … Web(Tirath Singh v. Bachittar Singh, A.I.R. 1955 S.C. 830 Rule of Harmonious Construction It is the responsibility of the Courts to avoid “a head-on clash” between two sections of the same Act, “whenever it is possible to do so, to construct provisions which appear to conflict so that they harmonize” (Raj Krishna v.

WebAn account cited that after Singh fought on the bank of a stream called Sarsa, where all of his companions perished, he was wounded during an encounter with the Mughal army on …

Web(October 25, 1948), provides for an appeal to a Division Bench against a judgment, decree or order of one Judge of the High Court, on a certificate granted by the Judge or in his absence by the Chief Justice, except where the judgment, decree or order is made in exercise of criminal appellate jurisdiction or in exercise of the powers of … low key birthday ideas for adultsWebOn May 28, 1962 M/s Azad Bharat Finance Co. applied in the court of Shri M.C Bohre, in which the trial of Harbhajan Singh was going on, for the release of the truck. On September 7, 1962, Harbhajan Singh was acquitted by the Magistrate but he ordered that the truck be confiscated to the State. jason thompson dds cincinnatiWeb(Tirath Singh v. Bachittar Singh, A.I.R. 1955 S.C. 830 Rule of Harmonious Construction. It is the responsibility of the Courts to avoid “a head-on clash” between two sections of the … jason thompson georgia gopWebNov 5, 2024 · Pritipal Singh V. Union Of India There was the criminal case was against the defendant, the charge sheet was filed as per the violations and provisions under the ‘Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act, 1985’ and the interpretation of words was in question. The court emphasized the literal rule of interpretation. jason thompson dds ohio jason thompson dds muskegoWebThe view taken by the Gujarat High Court in (1981) 132 ITR 159 (Guj) (supra) has been upheld by the Supreme Court in case of CIT v. Madhukant M. Mehta (2001) 247 ITR 805 (SC). 10. In CIT v. J.H. Gotla (supra), the fact of the case are that assessee has transferred some part of the machinery of his business to wife and minor children. Wife has ... low key beach vacations floridaWebTIRATH SINGH Vs BACHITTAR SINGH AND OTHERS. 15 September 1955 Supreme Court Download. TIRATH SINGH Vs BACHITTAR SINGH AND OTHERS. Case number: Appeal … jason thompson dds houston tx