WebThe Director of Lands and Director of Forest Development filed an opposition alleging that neither applicants nor their predecessor-in-interest possessed sufficient title to the land, not having acquired the same under any of the recognized Spanish titles under the Royal Decree of February 13, 1894; that neither applicants, nor their predecessors … WebDIRECTOR OF LANDS VS. ABAJA. Civil. Suggest Category. LAUREL, J. G. R. No. 42134, October 21, 1936 THE DIRECTOR OF LANDS, PETITIONER AND APPELLEE, VS. ISIDORO ABAJA ET AL., CLAIMANTS. ROMAN DE ARRUZA AND MARIO …
Did you know?
WebSUPREME COURT Manila. THIRD DIVISION . G.R. No. 102858 July 28, 1997. THE DIRECTOR OF LANDS, petitioner, vs. COURT OF APPEALS and TEODORO ABISTADO, substituted by MARGARITA, MARISSA, MARIBEL, ARNOLD and MARY ANN, all surnamed ABISTO, respondents. PANGANIBAN, J.: Is newspaper publication of the notice of initial … WebMar 30, 2024 · Atty. Erwin L. Tiamson Land Titles and Deeds List of Cases V.3 27. Gabriel Lasam v. Director of Lands and Jose Chan hong Hin, et al., G.R. No. L-42859, March 17, 1938 • An applicant for registration of land, if he relies on a document evidencing his title, must prove not only the genuiness of his title but the identity of the land 28. Cambridge …
Web(Heirs of Luno vs. Marguez, 48 Phil., 855; Government of the Philippine Island vs. Heirs of Abella, 49 Phil., 374, 380; Fernandez Hermanos vs. Director of Lands, supra.) No competent or satisfactory evidence was presented by the appellants to establish the privity of title or possession between Garay, the alleged successor in interest. WebIn Director of Lands vs. Rivas, [19] this Court ruled: "Grazing lands and timber lands are not alienable under Section 1, Article XIII of the 1935 Constitution and sections 8, 10 and 11 of Article XIV of the 1973 Constitution. Section 10 distinguishes strictly agricultural lands (disposable) from grazing lands (inalienable)."
WebG.R. No. L-42134 October 21, 1936. THE DIRECTOR OF LANDS, petitioner-appellee, vs. ISIDORO ABAJA, ET AL., claimants. ROMAN DE ARRUZA and MARIO LUZURIAGA, appellants. Simeon Bitanga for appellants. Office of the Solicitor-General Hilado for … WebDirector of Lands v. Buyco G.R. No. 91189; November 27, 1992. FACTS: A certain Charles Hankins, an American who was married to Laura Crescini, died leaving a will and was survived by his widow; his son Alexander and William; and his grandchildren Ismael Samuel and Edgar, all surnamed Buyco, who are the legitimate issues of his deceased …
WebOn January 25, 1934, a motion was filed in the same court by the herein... appellants, Roman de Arruza and Mario Luzuriaga, through their attorney, praying that the aforesaid decision of the lower court be set aside in so far as lot No. 712 was concerned, that a …
WebDIRECTOR OF LANDS VS. CA Civil Suggest Category PURISIMA, J. THIRD DIVISION G. R. No. L-47380, February 23, 1999 DIRECTOR OF LANDS, PETITIONER, VS. THE HON. COURT OF APPEALS, CARMEN TIBUDAN, EUGENIA TIBUDAN, LOLITA TIBUDAN-SOLIS AND FRANCISCO TIBUDAN, RESPONDENTS. D E C I S I O N PURISIMA, J.: fyscsWebThe Director of Lands has brought this appeal by certiorari from a judgment of the Intermediate Appellate Court affirming a decision of the Court of First Instance of Isabela, which ordered registration in favor of Acme Plywood & Veneer Co., Inc. of five parcels of land measuring 481, 390 square meters, more or less, acquired by it from Mariano … fys kartal ambalajWebTHE DIRECTOR OF LANDS, Petitioner-Appellee, v. ISIDORO ABAJA, ET AL., claimants. ROMAN DE ARRUZA and MARIO LUZURIAGA, Appellants. Simeon Bitanga for Appellants. Solicitor-General Hilado for Appellee. SYLLABUS 1. CADASTRAL ACTS; LEGISLATIVE … atlassian login jiraWebIn Director of Lands v. Intermediate Appellate Court. When a land of public domain is unclassified, it cannot be released and rendered open for private disposition pursuant to the Regalian Doctrine and that the private applicant in a land registration case has the burden of proof to overcome State ownership of the lands of public domain, to wit: fysa csvfysal selkoWeb(Susi v. Razon, 46 Phil. 424, Vaño v. Gov’t). And the right thus acquired cannot be defeated by a subsequent declaration of the land by the Bureau of Forestry as timber land within a forest zone, or by the fact that there are some trees valuable for timber growing on the … fys mek 1110WebOct 27, 2024 · Director of Lands vs Court of Appeals and Bisnar (GR No. 83609, October 26, 1989)5. Lee Hong Hok vs David (GR No. L-30389, December 27, 1972) 6. Director of Lands vs CA and Valeriano (GR No. 58867, June 22, 1984) 7. Mesina vs Sonza (GR No. L-14722, May 25, 1960) 8. Pajomayo vs Manipon (GR No. L-33676, June 30, 1971) 9. fysalbank egypt online